The Great Pyramid of Giza May Have Functioned as an Energy Power Station

A group of researchers have concluded that the Great Pyramid of Giza may have functioned as a kind of giant power station, capable of collecting and accumulating energy.
This hypothesis stems from experiments conducted by scientists, who discovered that electromagnetic wave energy was concentrated within the pyramid at specific points, including areas where the pharaohs’ tombs were located.
Retired aerospace engineer Christopher Dunn recently elaborated on this theory in an interview with Joe Rogan.
Dunn suggested that the Egyptian civilization might have utilized chemical reactions to produce hydrogen, which could have served as an energy source. According to the hypothesis, this process was intricately integrated into the pyramid’s design.
He said: “That’s a part of the theory in the Giza power plant. There are two chemicals that are introduced into the chamber, and the chemicals mix, and they boil off hydrogen (creating energy).
“I don’t think there’s any part of that pyramid that did not serve a practical function.”
Dunn emphasized that every detail of the Great Pyramid served a functional purpose. He highlighted the ancient Egyptians’ profound knowledge and understanding of physics, which enabled them to create such a precise architectural marvel.
Drawing a parallel to modern technology, Dunn compared the pyramid to contemporary nuclear power plants, suggesting that future generations will recognize these structures as having been built with a clear and sophisticated intent.
Despite the compelling arguments, several questions remain unanswered. What type of energy were the ancient Egyptians collecting? For what purposes did they utilize this stored energy? And, perhaps most intriguingly, how did they develop such advanced technologies?
Dunn has dedicated nearly 30 years to studying the pyramids using computer technology. His research has led him to believe that ancient architects possessed access to precise measuring instruments and even construction equipment.
However, to date, archaeological evidence has not substantiated the existence of such tools.