Are Aliens Too Green to Be Found?
For over 40 years, SETI has searched the cosmos for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence, grappling with the Fermi paradox: If the universe is so vast, where are all the aliens?
Among many theories—rare life, evolutionary hurdles, or communication barriers—one stands out as eerily relevant today: the “Sustainability Solution,” reports popularmechanics.com.
Proposed in 2009 by scientists Jacob Haqq-Misra and Seth Baum, this theory suggests that advanced civilizations either adapt to their planet’s ecological limits or collapse.
Instead of building detectable megastructures like Dyson Spheres, sustainable aliens might merge technology with nature, making them invisible to our searches.
In a new study, philosopher Lukáš Likavčan revisits this idea, framing technology and history on a planetary scale. He argues that viable civilizations must fold their technosphere (human-made systems) back into the biosphere—meaning advanced tech may become indistinguishable from nature.
Humans, in this view, are temporary stewards: our creations might either evolve sustainably or lead to collapse.
This challenges the assumption of endless growth. As Haqq-Misra and Baum noted, aliens may exist but avoid rapid expansion, leaving no trace. Or, past civilizations may have risen and fallen without detectable remnants.
Likavčan cites sci-fi author Karl Schroeder’s twist on Arthur C. Clarke: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from nature.” If true, we’ve been searching for the wrong signs.
Can we balance progress with sustainability? Or will we, like countless potential civilizations before us, vanish into cosmic silence?
